Harvard School of Engineering

2025

Designing Harvard's tour-booking platform

Creating a 3-step web-based product subscription platform to support Kleenex product growth

Role

UX Designer & Researcher

Timeline

4 weeks

Team

Emily Helms (PM), Holden Schermer (SWE)

Tools

Figma, Lovable

Role

UX Designer & Researcher

Timeline

4 weeks

Team

Emily Helms (PM), Holden Schermer (SWE)

Tools

Figma, Lovable

Overview

Personalized Harvard experiences, in visitors' culture

To help retired international visitors overcome language barriers and form meaningful connections with Harvard culture, my team designed Crimson Guide Connect ↗, a web-first booking platform matching international retirees with Harvard student guides who share their language, culture, and hobbies.

My Contribution

  • Conducted in-person interviews with elderly tourists, used results from hypothesis testing to synthesize pain points.

  • Prototyped initial wireframe and ran user testing with 6 stakeholders.

  • Designed final 5-minute demo pitch deck, presented in front of Harvard faculty and peers.

+30%

Tourist booking intent

45% -> 75%

+30%

Tourist booking intent

45% -> 75%

$360K

Projected value

12K bookings/year

$360K

Projected value

12K bookings/year

1/4

Distinction Projects

Recognized among 16 teams

1/4

Distinction Projects

Recognized among 16 teams

Problem

Supporting underserved, elderly visitors

Of Harvard's 8M annual visitors, 240K are retired elders from countries outside of the US, many of which are non English-speaking countries. Our secondary research ↗ revealed 3 problems:

Source: the Harvard Crimson, "Tourists in the Yard" (2025)

This shaped our initial assumption that retired international visitors cannot fully access the Harvard experience due to language barriers, which means we should build for better translation and minimalist interface. However…

Updated insight & validation

After interviewing 10 retired international tourists, we learned that while the 3 pain points remain true, our target users don’t need another translation app. Instead, their strongest desire is to form authentic, meaningful connections with Harvard’s students and culture, which official tours fail to provide.

These responses reshaped our approach to considering how tourists can receive customizable Harvard experiences without language barrier.

Method: interview in Harvard Yard. We spoke languages we knew (Mandarin, French, German, Vietnamese), or used Google Translate.

"I wish I could vividly feel what it's like to live and study at Harvard, and not just tell me when thing were built and what they're for."

Marianne

French tourist, 67 years old

My parents don't speak English at all, but Harvard's official tours are English-only, so I didn't book a tour because it can't help them learn or feel involved.

Sunny

Korean tourist, with 70+ yo parents

Two-sided marketplace validation

Two-sided marketplace validation

The solution is to involve people who know Harvard the best: students. Interviewing 6 Harvard students and 6 new international tourist groups helped us validated demand on both sides, confirming two-sided marketplace viability.

Method: second round of in-person field research in Harvard Yard.

Solution

Reflection

Uncover the “why,” not just the “what”

Our initial assumption about user needs was challenged, proving that design must begin with data-supported research.

Foster human connection, not replace it

AI usage should be case-specific. We leveraged human elements for genuine connection rather than relying on AI, which is powerful but doesn’t give the human connection users ask for.

Optimize usability, not sacrifice function

We strategically combined design concepts for efficiency and clarity in the final workflow.

Decision

Problem 1: Choosing Solution Approach — Marketplace vs. AI

Method: rapid prototyping 4 distinct solutions, then finalizing top 2 impactful designs

Decision: Combine the strengths of A and B

Final wireframe

Problem 2: Booking Flow — Guide-First vs. Date-First

Our first wireframe lets users “select guide” first for highest profile compatibility. But users were confused by unavailable dates.

Decision: Select visit time first, then student guide

After iterating based on user testing results, users select visit time first, then guides. Testing this alongside our previous design, 8/10 users completed booking action.